I think for me, I’ve been a beneficiary of using MIT licenses (in minor ways, no large or famous projects) and so when I publish code I prefer sharing as MIT.

I think for me, I’ve been a beneficiary of using MIT licenses (in minor ways, no large or famous projects) and so when I publish code I prefer sharing as MIT. Maybe I should reconsider, but I never thought anyone would remove an MIT license. That sounds like plagiarism (though they did put a thank you in their repo)