4 ms·
> Really going hard on the Wilhoit, huh? I guess that's a reference to some fictional "Wilhoit's Law", right? I had to look it up. Turns out it's just a partis
by leereeves 1y ago
> Really going hard on the Wilhoit, huh?
I guess that's a reference to some fictional "Wilhoit's Law", right? I had to look it up. Turns out it's just a partisan Internet snipe from a classical music composer originally posted in the comments on a blog[1].
That sums up the case against Hegseth nicely. Just a partisan attack without substance, sustained only by ignorance.
1: https://slate.com/business/2022/06/wilhoits-law-conservatives-frank-wilhoit.html https://slate.com/business/2022/06/wilhoits-law-conservative...
- piva00 1y agoWithout substance? Using chats without double checking who are members of the chat group is a thing not even I do when sharing some gossip, lol. That's blatant incompetence, a person responsible for the USA defence cannot be bothered to cross the members list of a group chat before sharing extremely sensitive information. And now he's adding his family into the mix?
- maxerickson 1y agoI don't think it's ignorant to think you are extending him an awful lot of grace.
- leereeves 1y agoI've just seen all this - nepotism, classified info outside government channels, the occasional mistake - often enough to recognize that people only get outraged about it when "the other side" does it.