3 ms·
Listen to yourself. You’re equating the destruction of an original piece of art to the horrors of buying something from eBay. It’s utterly pathetic. The world i
by wat10000 2y ago
Listen to yourself. You’re equating the destruction of an original piece of art to the horrors of buying something from eBay. It’s utterly pathetic. The world isn’t obligated to cater to your desires. “But there are scammers!” Sometimes getting what you want takes a bit of effort. Requiring you to spend more than thirty seconds obtaining the original is not equivalent to destroying it.
- YurgenJurgensen 2y agoI never said that; you’re just straight-up lying about me equating those two things. I wasn’t even responding to that. Maybe you should listen to what people are saying before telling them to listen to themselves.
- wat10000 2y agoYou're in a comment thread where correcting errors in a movie was compared to the destruction of a fresco. I argued it was not the same because the original is still available in the former case. Your argument is that it is not actually available. I don't know how else I'm supposed to interpret this. If the original is not available then it's an act of destruction. If the original is available then it's fine. Where it goes off the rails is when you say the original is not available when it plainly is, you just don't want to deal with the very minor hassle of buying a used copy.
- YurgenJurgensen 2y agoI said ‘often’ not available. Please read my posts. Words mean things.
- wat10000 2y agoNo you didn’t.