6 ms·
He was, but John Paul II was traditionally conservative. I think Francis resonated with more people–Christian or not–because he emphasized compassion, humility,
by carlos-menezes 2y ago
He was, but John Paul II was traditionally conservative. I think Francis resonated with more people–Christian or not–because he emphasized compassion, humility, and social justice.
He spoke more openly about issues like poverty, climate change, and inclusion–his encyclical LAUDATO SI’ is a great read–, and he often used language and gestures that the "common man" could relate to.
Perhaps the way he dressed so simply–with the plain white cassock–also emphasized his overall approach: less focus on grandeur, more on service.
- bootsmann 2y agoDidn’t JPII rebuild the curia so that progressive popes like Francis could get closer to the keys of power?
- bonzini 2y agoYes and no. He was at the same time very open to being "part of the world" beyond the church, but also very conservative in ethics. In the end the former prevailed also in terms of progressiveness, but it wasn't a given.
- emmelaich 2y agoI think it's interesting that PJII was very popular with Catholics and possibly less so with non-Christian. Despite or because being more conservative? He was also a very good man and humble.
- andrepd 2y agoHe also covered up sexual abuses, game power to the Opus Dei, and aggressively pushed the disgusting mandate against condoms in the middle of the AIDS pandemic. Yeah, not a fan.
- dfxm12 2y agoJPII was a long running Pope. I would guess most people wouldn't know how conservative or not he was, or even what means in the context of the Catholic Church. He was the first Pope many of us knew, and the Pope who was with many of us the longest. He is probably most well known for the pope mobile.
- yusina 2y ago[flagged]
- neves 2y agoHe actively visited other countries and celebrated massive masses. I believe he was the first Pope to travel around the world bringing his faith. He also efficiently used the media.
- bonzini 2y agoJP was a great communicator. He understood what it meant for the church to talk to the people—first by traveling to many countries and in opposition to communist atheism, later with the organization of the Journee Mondiale de la Jeunesse. During the late 90s there was a pretty big Catholic spiritual movement towards boys and girls in their late teens or early 20s and it's crazy how big the JMJ was. His trick was hiding the conservative positions behind the mask of the beloved communicator.
- angra_mainyu 2y agoDon't know about that. I'm not a catholic and still view him in a much more favorable light than Francis. I think maybe it's just some progressives (and related groups) who liked Francis a lot for many of his positions.
- column 2y ago[flagged]
- scrollop 2y ago"telling Ukraine to "have the courage of the white flag"." Perhaps he should have told Russia to have the "courage" to stop murdering people.
- redeeman 2y agodo you think that would have even the slightest chance of changing anything?
- mgiannopoulos 2y agoSo never speak against brutal aggressors who commit war crimes? That seems to be antithetical to Christian values.
- redeeman 2y agowhere did I say that? I am merely saying, that what WAS said might have higher chance of helping
- raverbashing 2y agoNo but it puts the ball on their court
- pc86 2y agoThe ball was never in the Catholic Church's court in the first place, so no it does not.
- raverbashing 2y agoNeither is the Israel/Gaza conflict ball, doesn't preclude them from voicing their opinion on it
- detourdog 2y agoPope Francis was the only Pope that resonated with me. I was really shocked that at how human his words were. The moment he came on the scene he seemed genuine and honest. I hope they find more like him.
- alistairSH 2y agoThere was an interview on NPR this morning with a high-level Jesuit in the Americas (former leader of the order in Canada and USA, IIRC). He put it well... Pope Francis was always a pastor at heart. And he put the needs of the person in front of him ahead of strict doctrine. The interviewee likened it to triage in a field hospital - address the soul in front of you, worry about doctrine later (suture the wound, worry about cholesterol later).
- mantas 2y agoJPII was also elected in a very different world. And he played a big moral role in taking down iron curtain and getting Eastern Europe back Europe. Meanwhile Francis was quite the opposite. Especially as seen in the light of Russian aggression against Ukraine. For much of Eastern Europe that was like 180 turn. At least here both church goers and not seem to despise Francis while JPII has a warm place in the hearts both factions. Maybe it was different far away where Russia ain’t a hot topic.
- dml2135 2y agoCan you elaborate on what you mean here? You seem to be alluding to a stance that Francis had towards Russia that I am not familiar with.
- mantas 2y agoHe said Ukraine should surrender. To Russia which wants to exterminate Ukraine as a nation, culture and language. Feel free to google for more details. There were multiple occurrences when he doubled-down on his words after backlash.
- gosub100 2y agoAnd if he rallied for war he'd be criticized just the same: "leader of the Christians is such a hypocrite advocating for killing .."
- psunavy03 2y agoJust war theory was first written on in the West by Saint Augustine.
- dragonwriter 2y ago> He said Ukraine should surrender. Which would be bad, had he done so, but he didn't actually say that; the white flag comment was specifically and explicitly about being willing to directly negotiate with Russia, not about surrender. > There were multiple occurrences when he doubled-down on his words after backlash. He certainly called on multiple occasions for all parties to negotiate, but he was also consistent, both before Russia invaded, after the invasion and before the "white flag" comment, immediately after the "white flag" comment, and since that the invasion by Russia is (or "would be" before it occurred) unjustifiable, immoral, an act of aggression, and that Russia has the primary obligation to stop it.
- svieira 2y agoHe also spoke incredibly directly about abortion - "hiring a hitman" cuts right to the heart of the issue.
- lotsofpulp 2y ago[flagged]
- bigstrat2003 2y ago[flagged]
- lupusreal 2y agoI sincerely hope that at some point we can develop artificial wombs and use them to render this whole debate moot. Instead of abortion we can take the fetus out, put it into an artificial womb then let it be raised as an orphan or whatever. It should make both sides happy, IF they are both being honest about their motives.
- lotsofpulp 2y ago[flagged]
- lupusreal 2y agoBoth sides present the most agreeable arguments for their position, while publicly omitting other motives, while simultaneously highlighting the least agreeable motives of their opponents and omitting or flat out denying their more agreeable motives. I don't mind being candid (not least because I am not an important person and this is not an important discussion, the stakes are low so there is no pressing need to lie), so I'll say one of the quiet parts out loud for the side I mainly sit on: I think there is plausible social benifit to aborting pregnancies caused by rapists. Not only because rapists might carry genes for aggression, but also because rape circumvents the valuable social/physical fitness selection which women normally perform when choosing who to have babies with. Pro-choice advocates will almost never admit to believing anything like this, because it essentially validates the criticism antiabortion advocates have, that their opponents are eugenicists. To be clear, many pro-choice advocates aren't, and I don't think this particular argument would make or break the debate (it doesn't for me), but it is a potential source of contention pro-choice people might have with my artificial womb proposal.
- Slava_Propanei 2y ago[dead]