It would be cool if Zig added a .. syntax, the same way . gets a child field, .. gets the parent field Then the code would become ``` const user: *User = n..

It would be cool if Zig added a .. syntax, the same way . gets a child field, .. gets the parent field Then the code would become ``` const user: *User = n.. ``` Now it's easier to understand that .. is simply getting the parent struct.