> are those photos already in the training data that the model was trained on? The photos are of course in the training data. Most humans too, would have seen

> are those photos already in the training data that the model was trained on? The photos are of course in the training data. Most humans too, would have seen a large fraction of these photos before. But associating it with a year is where the magic happens. You are dismissing a technology capability that was science fiction a year or two ago.