3 ms·
Yup, LLMs took you to recitals, not to the articles themselves. This is definitely better than invalid info, I'll grant you that.
by troupo 2y ago
Yup, LLMs took you to recitals, not to the articles themselves. This is definitely better than invalid info, I'll grant you that.
- simonw 2y agoI fed in the entire act with the articles and the recitals. The full response from Gemini included information from the articles, but I didn't quote that directly in my blog post. Here's that full response: https://gist.github.com/simonw/f2e341a2e8ea9ca75c6426fa85bc2dfc https://gist.github.com/simonw/f2e341a2e8ea9ca75c6426fa85bc2... Relevant section: > Article 53(2) provides an exception from the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models regarding technical documentation (Art 53(1)(a)) and providing information to downstream providers (Art 53(1)(b)) if the models are released under a free and open-source license and their parameters (including weights), information on model architecture, and information on model usage are made publicly available. This exemption does not apply to general-purpose AI models with systemic risks.