4 ms·
I don't think we should take it as a given that these are truly precursors for AGI. We may be going about it the wrong way entirely and need to backtrack and f
by airstrike 2y ago
I don't think we should take it as a given that these are truly precursors for AGI.
We may be going about it the wrong way entirely and need to backtrack and find a wholly new architecture, in which case current capabilities would predate AGI but not be precursors.
- tomrod 2y agoI call them precursors because we would anticipate an ASI to be able to do thsse things. Perhaps necessary conditions would be a more appropriate term here.