3 ms·
No I didn't write that, and I don't believe that's true at the margin in SF. Some cities tax too little and would benefit from taxing more, SF is not one of the
by mgraczyk 1y ago
No I didn't write that, and I don't believe that's true at the margin in SF. Some cities tax too little and would benefit from taxing more, SF is not one of them
- olddustytrail 1y agoYou did write that, you just separated them with a couple of paragraphs. I recall that worked to confuse ChatGPT v2 as it lost context, but it shouldn't confuse a human.
- mgraczyk 1y agoWould you mind quoting the portion of my comment where you think I said anything about public sector pay causing better outcomes?
- olddustytrail 1y ago> We spent more per resident on most services than nearly every other city in the country. And then > Look around San Francisco today. What has changed recently? Crime is way down, lower than it has been in 15 years. Homelessness is down, lower than the past 4 years.
- mgraczyk 1y agoPublic sector pay does not cause better outcomes in SF. They are not correlated and what you just quoted doesn't make that claim. Specifically, it's compatible with what I actually believe, which is that public sector pay has been high and the causes of lower crime are not related to that
- olddustytrail 1y agoI didn't say it did, I was just quoting your own argument. Maybe if you were less of a useless shit there might be an argument for you.
- mgraczyk 1y agoYou said that I wrote that higher public sector pay correlates with better outcomes. I didn't write that though. I think you confused my comment with somebody else