4 ms·
Which light-weight server-side frameworks you would recommend then? apache click? I could not find any which is popular.
by rohshall 14y ago
Which light-weight server-side frameworks you would recommend then? apache click? I could not find any which is popular.
- rauar 14y agoRails/Grails/Node ... I'm still using Spring MVC a lot for implementing REST-like APIs (annotated controllers are all I need). These APIs are the foundation for client-side templates (currently I prefer Handlebars) then. Granted... Spring MVC requires a round-trip for API changes as well compared to more dynamic languages but it's quite short due to the compact and focused backend-code base.
- rauar 14y agoBTW: one more thing which I initially did not mention is that Wicket generates a hell lot of client-side code with loads of nested DIVs (per component probably), weird and long wicket IDs which tell you nothing (they are automatically created). Pretty tough to get used to - especially for someone trying to understand what happens "under the hood".
- rohshall 14y agoThank you. I was under the impression that Spring MVC (actually Spring, in general) requires a lot of XML configuration. But, maybe it's the best bet now. I checked out Play 2.0. It's a nice framework, but documentation is sparse, which is a show-stopper for a newbie like me.