4 ms·
What kind of computations were you doing on MRI which resulted in such performance boost by switching to JRuby? I have tried Rails under JRuby many times, the p
by dataminer 14y ago
What kind of computations were you doing on MRI which resulted in such performance boost by switching to JRuby? I have tried Rails under JRuby many times, the performance is the same as 1.9.3 and memory consumption usually higher.
- jacques_chester 14y agoRedmine. Runs faster and smaller per instance of the application.
- jacques_chester 14y agoLooking at my post again, I guess I didn't do a very good job. I didn't mean 2.5Mb per copy of the JVM. I meant per runtime within the JVM. These are run as threads, rather than processes. So we're really comparing n instances of MRI * 50Mb vs 1 JVM + (n * 2.5Mb) Where the cost of the JVM itself is amortised over the application instances. Sorry, what I said originally is easily misleading.