4 ms·
Agree, they are not the same thing. Yes, S3 provides much better durability. I just can't afford it. For my use-case I'm OK with un-hedged risk and dollars sta
by xyzzy123 2y ago
Agree, they are not the same thing. Yes, S3 provides much better durability. I just can't afford it.
For my use-case I'm OK with un-hedged risk and dollars staying in my pocket.
- ornornor 2y agoI backup my nas to rsync.net, it’s very cost effective using borg backup.
- remram 2y ago$0.01/GB/mo, that does not seem better than Glacier, is it?
- ornornor 2y agoExcept it’s not glacier speeds, there are no bandwidth costs, support is on a completely different level than aws (you can actually reach an actual knowledgeable human), and you can use anything that speaks ssh. They also have an expert price at 0.008$/gb/mo here https://www.rsync.net/products/borg.html https://www.rsync.net/products/borg.html