4 ms·
I'm going to guess in fair faith, that op has absolutely no desire to excuse or advocate such things. Probably feeling barraged, he replied defensively, annoye
by eth0up 1y ago
I'm going to guess in fair faith, that op has absolutely no desire to excuse or advocate such things. Probably feeling barraged, he replied defensively, annoyed that expressing an understanding of the subject contrary to the TFAs tone, was interpreted as support for evil shit.
I'll further guess that in a fresh situation, he'd probably agree with you.
- like_any_other 1y agoThere's nothing to agree with, as, as far as I can tell, tptacek didn't voice any opinions, only asked a leading question - for some reason, pointing out part of the article is unsubstantiated speculation trying to pass itself off as near-certain fact, prompted him to wonder if there's an effort (somewhere!) to defend this act of mass murder. Edit: I don't understand why you think I'm some authority on how McVeigh is perceived, but to humor you, no, I don't know of any efforts to 'rehabilitate' him.
- tptacek 1y agoI'm not sure I see how it's "leading" and I'm starting to wonder why you don't seem to be able to answer it? You get that you can retain all your stated concerns and still not know of an effort to rehabilitate McVeigh, right?