9 ms·
I feel like you're making the opposite case. Given such large N, it would easier to detect positive correlations to aggressive cancers, no?
by mh- 2y ago
I feel like you're making the opposite case. Given such large N, it would easier to detect positive correlations to aggressive cancers, no?
- ein0p 2y agoTo detect you have to actually collect the data in a robust way and then analyze it. Some areas of study seem to be off-limits either for political reasons, or because Big Pharma won't fund them, or both. The other day I told o3 to do deep research on the prevalence of SSRI use among mass shooters. It did compile a report which basically said the data is inconclusive because the current laws prevent conclusive data from being assembled in the first place. I frankly don't see why a mass shooter deserves HIPAA protection. Let's look into it.