4 ms·
I don't know if I should be surprised about what's described in this article, given the current state of the world. Certainly I didn't know about it before, and
by Liftyee 1y ago
I don't know if I should be surprised about what's described in this article, given the current state of the world. Certainly I didn't know about it before, and I agree with the article's conclusion.
Personally, I think the "network sharing" software bundled with apps should fall into the category of potentially unwanted applications along with adware and spyware. All of the above "tag along" with something the user DID want to install, and quietly misuse the user's resources. Proxies like this definitely have an impact for metered/slow connections - I'm tempted to start Wireshark'ing my devices now to look for suspicious activity.
There should be a public repository of apps known to have these shady behaviours. Having done some light web scraping for archival/automation before, it's a pity that it'll become collateral damage in the anti-AI-botfarm fight.
- zzo38computer 1y agoI agree, this should be called spyware, and malware. There are many other kind of software that also should, but netcat and ncat (probably) aren't malware.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- akoboldfrying 1y agoI agree, but the harm done to the users is only one part of the total harm. I think it's quite plausible that many users wouldn't mind some small amount of their bandwidth being used, if it meant being able to use a handy browser extension that they would otherwise have to pay actual dollars for -- but the harm done to those running the servers remains.