3 ms·
No it’s relative. ;)
by gerad 1y ago
No it’s relative. ;)
- pavel_lishin 1y agoWell, it certainly didn't happen tomorrow.
- exe34 1y agoin some reference frames, yes.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- wizzwizz4 1y agoNo, not if we've observed it. There are predicted historical events which can be shunted into the future by running away bravely, but if you've seen them happen, you can only change how long ago.
- exe34 1y agonot for us, but in some other reference frame.
- wizzwizz4 1y agoIf by "reference frame" you mean "observer who lives in the past", then yes: the past is sometimes the future of a more distant past.
- exe34 1y agono, relativity allows for reference frames where the event hasn't happened yet, even though it has happened for you. there's no simultaneous "it has already happened" for all frames.
- wizzwizz4 1y agoThere is if the event is in the past or future light cone. If A sends a signal to B, and B receives it, there is no reference frame where that signal went backwards in time. (Unless you count exotic ones, like "particle with imaginary rest mass is zooming along at thrice the speed of light", but you can't accelerate to such a reference frame so I don't.)