> race was essentially used as a tie breaker between equally qualified candidates. That’s demonstrably untrue. At Harvard, an Asian candidate at the top decile

> race was essentially used as a tie breaker between equally qualified candidates. That’s demonstrably untrue. At Harvard, an Asian candidate at the top decile of academic index scores had roughly the same admissions rate as a black candidate in the 4th decile: https://nypost.com/2023/06/29/supreme-court-affirmative-action-case-showed-astonishing-racial-gaps/ https://nypost.com/2023/06/29/supreme-court-affirmative-acti... The candidates were basically competing in entirely different lanes based on race.