3 ms·
Some discussion here: https://comp.mail.misc.narkive.com/TSEnT0kU/rfc-compliant-signatures-which-rfc-is-it https://comp.mail.misc.narkive.com/TSEnT0kU/rfc-comp
by slater 2y ago
Some discussion here:
https://comp.mail.misc.narkive.com/TSEnT0kU/rfc-compliant-signatures-which-rfc-is-it https://comp.mail.misc.narkive.com/TSEnT0kU/rfc-compliant-si...
- creatonez 2y agoAh, that explains it. We're supposed to remember conventions from the Usenet days. I am sad to report that Usenet users are in their 50s and 60s now, so someone will need to pass the torch or this information will be lost to time! Snarkiness aside, I genuinely appreciate that email formatting was documented somewhere, even if it turns out that signature rules were just a convention and not a MUST in that RFC2646 document (as I would have expected given how forcefully people say it is the correct way)
- aaronmdjones 2y agoFor what it's worth, I used to post to Usenet a lot in my teens, and I'm only 34 now :)