3 ms·
It is not compulsory. The browser may warn about lack of HTTPS, but that's about it. And I won't visit such HTTP-only site since it indicates the site owner do
by warkdarrior 2y ago
It is not compulsory. The browser may warn about lack of HTTPS, but that's about it.
And I won't visit such HTTP-only site since it indicates the site owner does not care to protect my (meta)data, but they probably don't want my clicks.
- nottorp 2y agoAnd would you think this way if they didn't spam the "accept the risk and continue" scareware? Why is it phrased as the risk is coming from the web site, when the risk actually comes from the backbone and whoever is able to intercept your communications?
- cookie_monsta 2y ago(paraphrasing from memory because it's a while since I've seen it) > Your connection is insecure. Information you send could be intercepted by attackers. Accept the risk and continue? Explains the problem in simple terms. Calls out the website for being lazy and careless. Gives you the option to proceed if you don't care. Why is this scareware and how would you word it?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]