16 ms·
Why? I'd argue most users of that site like the skeleton ASCII-style UI, which is also fast (at least when compared to the today's JS-riddled sites).
by jruohonen 2y ago
Why? I'd argue most users of that site like the skeleton ASCII-style UI, which is also fast (at least when compared to the today's JS-riddled sites).
- sightbroke 2y agoI am curious too as to what needs changed as well. It appears functionality efficient, well organized, and fast as you observed.
- Brosper 2y agoWhy have you downvoted the post? Because you don't like my opinion?
- Brosper 2y agoYou don't understand UX/UI at all. It's User Experience and User Interface. This service is just obsolete and unfriendly. It's not about ASCII style etc.