3 ms·
it is recommended not to employ sarcasm when counterpoints are easily available
by Aeglaecia 2y ago
it is recommended not to employ sarcasm when counterpoints are easily available
- stavros 2y agoUnfortunately, when counterpoints are easily available, I expect the person to have already thought of them, hence the sarcasm.
- redczar 2y agoEdited to delete my comment. I was mistaken about who was replying to who. As such my comment was entirely wrong.
- stavros 2y agoPlease point me to where the original comment mentioned anything about violence.
- dmurray 2y agoWhat? There's zero suggestion in ndriscoll's comment that he's talking about "extremely violent porn". The most specific he gets is "furry porn", which might be a kink you don't approve of but is not obviously more objectionable than "people having sex".
- redczar 2y agoI made a mistake about who stavros was replying to. I edited my comment.
- ndriscoll 2y agoI was being somewhat flippant while also using a group that's known as a gateway to more deviant behaviors (e.g. libertarianism). I think though that you'll likely not find much success in litigating whether children ought to be able to access porn (and whether porn has anything close to a healthy depiction of relationships/sex. Yes, some healthy material exists. It's extremely rare, especially with commercial websites). e.g. no one thinks children should be able to shop at physical adult stores. It's probably more productive to participate in the "what to do about it" discussion.