4 ms·
Beware, the first link appears to be AI slop with at least some bogus information. For example, it says "While PostgreSQL 15 introduced basic WAL compression",
by cuu508 1y ago
Beware, the first link appears to be AI slop with at least some bogus information. For example, it says "While PostgreSQL 15 introduced basic WAL compression", but WAL compression has been around since before 15.
- ofrzeta 1y agoThat's a bit unfair, don't you think? https://www.percona.com/blog/new-wal-archive-module-library-in-postgresql-15/ https://www.percona.com/blog/new-wal-archive-module-library-...
- cuu508 1y agoThe pgedge article talks about WAL compression, not WAL archiving. It specifically mentions wal_compression parameter, which has been around since PostgreSQL 9.5: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-WAL-COMPRESSION https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/runtime-config-wal.html#...