That must be a restriction imposed on the court by Florida law - I think it’s pretty well established that ICE detainers alone don’t mandate anything of state c

That must be a restriction imposed on the court by Florida law - I think it’s pretty well established that ICE detainers alone don’t mandate anything of state courts or law enforcement. Even ICE’s website says this: > Immigration detainers are only requests. They don’t impose any obligations on law enforcement agencies https://www.ice.gov/immigration-detainers#:~:text=Immigration%20detainers%20are%20only%20requests,obligations%20on%20law%20enforcement%20agencies. https://www.ice.gov/immigration-detainers#:~:text=Immigratio... In Massachusetts where I live, the courts flat out ignore them and release individuals who are not accused of any crime, because: > Massachusetts law provides no authority for court officers to arrest and hold an individual because of a federal immigration detainer https://www.mass.gov/decision/lunn-v-commonwealth https://www.mass.gov/decision/lunn-v-commonwealth Otherwise… I have no idea why the judge would just cave to the prosecutor’s argument like that.