2 ms·
And every professor just groaned at the thought of having to read yet another AI-generated term paper.
by drob518 2y ago
And every professor just groaned at the thought of having to read yet another AI-generated term paper.
- jay_kyburz 2y agoThey should just get AI to mark them. I genuinely think this is one thing AI would do better than humans.
- mdp2021 2y agoGrading papers definitely requires intelligence.
- jay_kyburz 2y agoMy partner marked a PHD thesis yesterday and there was a spelling mistake in the title. There is some level of analysis and feedback than an LLM could provide before a human reviews it. Even if it's just a fancy spelling checker.
- mdp2021 2y agoI'd like to burst into a post a number of the unbelievable akin mishandlings of academic tasks I was reported, but. I do have a number of prize-worthy anecdotes that compete with yours. Nonetheless. Let us fight farce with rigour. Even when the tasks are not in-depth, but easier to assess, you still require a /reliable evaluator/. LLMs are not. Could they be at least employed as a virtual assistant, "parse and suggest, then I'll check"? If so, not randomly ("pick a bot"), but in full awareness of the specific instrument. That stage is not here.
- bufferoverflow 2y agoTake-home assignments are basically obsolete. Students who want to cheat, can do so easily. Of course, in the end, they cheat themselves, but that's not the point.