4 ms·
Can someone fill me in on why the comments so far are highly critical? Is it the art style (looks familiar but don’t know much about it) or just the genAI aspec
by thebruce87m 2y ago
Can someone fill me in on why the comments so far are highly critical? Is it the art style (looks familiar but don’t know much about it) or just the genAI aspect that people are tired of?
- Piko 2y agoNot sure if you're trolling, but there's a huge debate over exactly this kind of thing... e.g. see https://www.vox.com/artificial-intelligence/408786/ai-art-studio-ghibli-moral-injury-copyright https://www.vox.com/artificial-intelligence/408786/ai-art-st...
- thebruce87m 2y agoI’m not trolling, so it’s a copyright thing for the art style. From the comments it seemed to be something worse. Makes sense, thanks.
- Klonoar 2y agoIt’s not just copyright, it’s the respect for the artist behind the style itself. Don’t boil it down to just corporate/legalese. What you’re seeing is a human reaction.
- thebruce87m 2y agoI wasn’t trying to reduce it, someone called it “filth” and someone else said they’d go to hell and so I wondered if it was something to do with an art style normally associated with prohibited material or something like that.
- jasfi 2y agoArtists should be able to opt-out so the debate can be resolved. AFAIK they can. Also, Ghibli will likely benefit from the huge amount of publicity they've had with the AI image gen rush. It's the artists/studios that don't get named that would likely complain.
- GuinansEyebrows 2y agoBenefit how?
- GuinansEyebrows 2y agoSorry to dump a YT link on you but it doesn’t get any more succinct than this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngZ0K3lWKRc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngZ0K3lWKRc