5 ms·
Google also destroyed journalism as we know it. Who knows how the industry would look like, if it wasn't suffocated by its monopoly
by franczesko 1y ago
Google also destroyed journalism as we know it. Who knows how the industry would look like, if it wasn't suffocated by its monopoly
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- PunchTornado 1y agofacebook destroyed journalism
- ars 1y agoMedia companies destroyed journalism by making news into entertainment instead of information. For example by finding the one extremest in a group of people and running stories about his minority - but exciting - viewpoint, instead of the boring viewpoint of most of the group.
- franczesko 1y ago"this exclusionary conduct substantially harmed Google’s publisher customers" From the money perspective it was Google. But I agree on Facebook's contribution, as they've pretty much created an advertising cartel together
- fallingknife 1y agoJournalism destroyed itself
- chris_va 1y ago(disclaimer that I was the TL of Google News a very long time ago, so feel free to ignore what I say as biased) I would argue that monster.com and craiglist, which collectively removed the majority of newpaper revenue, were probably the nail in the coffin. You can see some of the decline pre-internet in this 1999 take: https://niemanreports.org/newspapers-arrive-at-economic-crossroads/ https://niemanreports.org/newspapers-arrive-at-economic-cros... ... which already laments the decline of journalism. Pre-internet, editorial boards were fundamentally gatekeepers of knowledge. They were certainly not unbiased, but for the most part they had a level of integrity. Now, one can find (or have pushed) any "narrative" one chooses, whether or not it bears any resemblance to reality. While Google does make it easier to find any/all of this content, I would argue that the intrinsic incentives of social media platforms for more engagement are probably the high order bit.