4 ms·
That's neat. Thanks for taking the effort to do that. How much of that is due to distance vs haze though?
by dangoldin 14y ago
That's neat. Thanks for taking the effort to do that. How much of that is due to distance vs haze though?
- kellishaver 14y agoGood point. It could very well be as much or more matter of aerial perspective rather than atmospheric haze.