3 ms·
Yeah, I read that part too late. In that case it seems that there's indeed a lot of overhead when building many crates from a cold-start, but it pays off in wal
by dietr1ch 2y ago
Yeah, I read that part too late. In that case it seems that there's indeed a lot of overhead when building many crates from a cold-start, but it pays off in wall time and can probably save resources in incremental builds.
- lsuresh 2y agoYes. We found both cold and incremental builds sped up. The incremental builds were the main win -- small changes to the SQL can sometimes complete in seconds for what used to be a full recompilation.
- rc00 2y agoRewrite it in Zig? You might even be able to sidestep the LLVM bottleneck entirely. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43016944 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43016944