4 ms·
Maybe AWS could start by making fast NVMes available - without requiring multi TB disks just to get 1 GB/s. S3FS experiments were run on 14 GB/s NVMe disks - an
by jamesblonde 2y ago
Maybe AWS could start by making fast NVMes available - without requiring multi TB disks just to get 1 GB/s. S3FS experiments were run on 14 GB/s NVMe disks - an order of magnitude higher throughput than anything available in AWS today.
SSDs Have Become Ridiculously Fast, Except in the Cloud:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39443679 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39443679
- kridsdale1 2y agoOn my home LAN connected with 10gbps fiber between MacBook Pro and server, 10 feet away, I get about 1.5gbps vs the non-network speed of the disks of ~50 gbps. (Bits, not bytes) I worked this out to the macOS SMB implementation really sucking. I set up a NFS driver and it got about twice as fast but it’s annoying to mount and use, and still far from the disk’s capabilities. I’ve mostly resorted to abandoning the network (after large expense) and using Thunderbolt and physical transport of the drives.
- greenavocado 2y agoIs NFS out of the question?
- kridsdale1 2y agoI have set it up but it’s not easy to get drivers working on a Mac.
- insaneirish 2y agoWhat particular drivers are you referring to? NFS is natively supported in MacOS...
- olavgg 2y agoThat is true, though the implementation is weird. I mount my nfs shares like this: sudo mount -t nfs -o nolocks -o resvport 192.168.1.1:/tank/data /mnt/data -o nolocks Disables file locking on the mounted share. Useful if the NFS server or client does not support locking, or if there are issues with lock daemons. On macOS, this is often necessary because lockd can be flaky. -o resvport Tells the NFS client to use a reserved port (<1024) for the connection. Some NFS servers (like some Linux configurations or *BSDs with stricter security) only accept requests from clients using reserved ports (for authentication purposes).
- dundarious 2y agoSMB/CIFS is an incredibly chatty, synchronous protocol. There are/were massive products built around mitigating and working around this when trying to use it over high latency satellite links (US military did/does this).
- __turbobrew__ 2y agoThere are i4i instances in AWS which can get you a lot of IOPS with a smaller disk.
- ashu1461 2y agoAre these attached directly to your server or hosted separately ?
- huntaub 2y agoi-series instances have direct-attached drives
- jamesblonde 2y agoHad a look - Baseline disk throughput is 78.12 MB/s. Max throughput (30 mins/day) is 1250 MB/s. NVMe i bought for 150 dollars with 4 TBs capacity gives me 6000 MB/s sustained https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ec2/latest/instancetypes/so.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ec2/latest/instancetypes/so.html
- sgarland 2y agoThat’s on the smallest instance. I’m sure there’s a reason they offer it, but I can’t think of why. On the largest instance (which IME is what people use with these), it’s 5000 MBps. The newer i7ie max out at 7500 MBps.
- __turbobrew__ 2y agoYou are incorrect, the numbers you are quoted is EBS volume performance. iX instances have directly attached NVME volumes which are separate from EBS. > NVMe i bought for 150 dollars Sure, now cost out the rest of the server, the racks, the colocation space for racks, power, multiple AZ redundancy, a clos network fabric, network peering, the spare hardware for failures, off site backups, supply chain management, a team of engineers to design the system, a team of staff to physically rack new hardware and unrack it, a team of engineers to manage the network, on call rotations for all those teams. Sure the NVME is just $150 bro.