> checking a damaged version of a file system with all of those capabilities as first class attributes was probably not NP complete. :-). I don't think I under

> checking a damaged version of a file system with all of those capabilities as first class attributes was probably not NP complete. :-). I don't think I understand this statement. Did you mean it was undecidable, that it's NP complete, or did you mean it was solvable in polynomial time? The latter is what it currently parses as for me, but also what makes the least sense in the context of the comment.