4 ms·
Good point about the DOI prefix. I don't think it's that arXiv article, though, since it says there is no statistically significant evidence for carbon dioxide
by philipkglass 2y ago
Good point about the DOI prefix. I don't think it's that arXiv article, though, since it says there is no statistically significant evidence for carbon dioxide or dimethyl sulfide. This NYT article (and presumably whatever journal article it's based upon) reports high levels of dimethyl sulfide.
- IanCal 2y agoYou're right, different authors too. https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/1069012 https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/1069012 uses the DOI in the article and says it's from > A. Smith, N. Madhusudhan (University of Cambridge) Here's another article on it https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39jj9vkr34o https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39jj9vkr34o I think this is still under embargo, or hasn't quite been released. There's going to be some time required for visuals like on the bbc site.