2 ms·
Those DOIs have a different prefix, I think it might be in Letters https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2041-8205 https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2041-8205 I
by IanCal 2y ago
Those DOIs have a different prefix, I think it might be in Letters
https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2041-8205 https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2041-8205
It's still not out yet though. Also journals are often rather tardy or just straight up don't register the doi at all and still put it on their site, but maybe this is an embargo thing.
edit - is it possibly this after publishing? https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18477 https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18477
- philipkglass 2y agoGood point about the DOI prefix. I don't think it's that arXiv article, though, since it says there is no statistically significant evidence for carbon dioxide or dimethyl sulfide. This NYT article (and presumably whatever journal article it's based upon) reports high levels of dimethyl sulfide.
- IanCal 2y agoYou're right, different authors too. https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/1069012 https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/1069012 uses the DOI in the article and says it's from > A. Smith, N. Madhusudhan (University of Cambridge) Here's another article on it https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39jj9vkr34o https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39jj9vkr34o I think this is still under embargo, or hasn't quite been released. There's going to be some time required for visuals like on the bbc site.