I'm having trouble following your argument. How is a retraction without any allegation or proof of misconduct comparable to retractions of fraudulent papers? Wh

I'm having trouble following your argument. How is a retraction without any allegation or proof of misconduct comparable to retractions of fraudulent papers? Why is fraudulent papers getting retracted a good reason to not worry when sound papers get retracted without cause? This paper was neither climate denialism, nor did it have AI illustrations or plagiarism, so how are those even relevant?