3 ms·
The post states: > One example where this requirement wasn't violated, is on build.nvidia.com But built with llama isn't shown prominently, so this is actuall
by NoahZuniga 2y ago
The post states:
> One example where this requirement wasn't violated, is on build.nvidia.com
But built with llama isn't shown prominently, so this is actually an example of a violation of the license.
- thot_experiment 2y agoThat's just like, your opinion man. This entire discussion and blog post are purely a fun distraction, legal contracts don't work how programmers think they work. The only definition of "prominently" that matters is the one the judge rules on when Zuck sues you.
- dangus 2y agoMeta is free to license Llama from Meta under a different license are they not?
- NoahZuniga 2y agoYes, but the post gives that as an example of what follows the license. So even if it's not illegal because nvidia has a different license, it doesn't follow as a good example.
- dangus 2y agoYeah, basically what I'm saying is that we can't even guarantee that it's an attempt at compliance with this specific license because it's a major corporation that may want to use the software under a different license negotiated privately.