3 ms·
> The argument hinges on what you mean by "avid," which you have opted not to define. Tiresome. > which after all is just that I've seen what I've seen and it
by lurk2 2y ago
> The argument hinges on what you mean by "avid," which you have opted not to define.
Tiresome.
> which after all is just that I've seen what I've seen and it's interesting to talk about that.
My argument is just that I’ve seen what I’ve seen and it contradicts what you’ve seen.
- throwanem 2y agoWell, at least we can agree we're both bullshitting, then. You won't, but we could. Other outcomes were possible: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43706093 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43706093
- lurk2 2y agoI’ve stated my argument plainly. You are being evasive because your argument is unconvincing. Review the site guidelines; you are violating several of them.
- throwanem 2y agoFlag my comments, then. Or does this throwaway of yours lack sufficient karma as yet for that? I forget, but I think probably. Mr. Gackle has had words with me before when I have caused the need; if he or his new offsider whose name I forget feels the same need now, no doubt they will again so remonstrate. In the meantime you, in seeking to speak from their cathedra, fail to impress.