3 ms·

because they already do? https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/ https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/ please, stop spreading your weird anti-europe views

• drstewart 2y ago
  Great. Then there's no loss here. What's the big deal?
  • sweezyjeezy 2y ago
    Your comments feel a bit incoherent - just extend your reasoning for why you think Europe should want to fund this back to the US again.
    • drstewart 2y ago
      Can you extend your reasoning for why you think the US should want to continue to fund this for the EU?
      • sweezyjeezy 2y ago
        "for"? You realise this is a homeland security matter for the US as well as the EU?
        • drstewart 2y ago
          Great. That's why the EU should fund it for the US. It's a security matter for them!
          • lobsterthief 2y ago
            It’s a security matter for the US. It’s a security matter for the EU. Both countries should pay for the security matter, as they were previously. Stop twisting the other poster’s words.
    • testbjjl 2y ago
      The GP sounds like one of these people who describe themselves as self made, or libertarian, where history begins where you like it and coalitions are only worthy when you’re the biggest benefactor. Best to ignore and let the leopards find them.
      • drstewart 2y ago
        [flagged]
      • sweezyjeezy 2y ago
        haha, sage advice