3 ms·

Democrat voters didn’t want anything to do with her during the 2020 primaries and didn’t turn out as much for her in 2024 as they did for Biden in 2020, so who

• watwut 2y ago
  Pretty clearly republicans, to be honest.
  • xienze 2y ago
    And this is why Democrats lost. Why admit and address that perhaps they ran a candidate that was deeply unpopular, even within her own party, when they could just instead blame the “misogynistic Republican” boogeyman.
    • stetrain 2y ago
      > And this is why Democrats lost. What do Democrats have to do with Republican candidates in a Republican primary?
      • xienze 2y ago
        Ah my mistake, I missed that this was referencing the Republican primaries here. Forgive me, the whole "Harris wasn't elected because Americans are misogynists" trope has been repeated so often I had that burned into my brain. Addressing the primaries, no one was beating Trump, it has nothing to do with his closest but still far distant challenger being a woman.
  • Jensson 2y ago
    Republicans would have voted for a Republican woman, they aren't the misogynists. Its more common for conservatives to elect women than for progressives to around the world, most female national leaders are right wing. The reason there aren't many women in the Republican party isn't the voters, its that not many women likes right wing politics no matter where in the world you are.
• stetrain 2y ago
  > Democrat voters didn’t want anything to do with her during the 2020 primaries and didn’t turn out as much for her in 2024 as they did for Biden in 2020, so who are the real misogynists here? Are you talking about Harris? I'm pretty sure she wasn't in the republican primaries so that isn't who the previous comment was talking about.