3 ms·
huh? this is a completely reasonable and seemingly quite transparent explaination. if you want a conspiracy, there are better places to look.
by mritchie712 1y ago
huh?
this is a completely reasonable and seemingly quite transparent explaination.
if you want a conspiracy, there are better places to look.
- ben0x539 1y agoWhen admitting fault with your a PR hat on after pissing off a decent(?) number of your paying customers, you're supposed to fully fall on your own sword, not assign blame to factors outside of your control. Instead of saying "race condition that appears on very slow internet connections", you might say "race condition caused by real-world network latencies that our in-office testing didn't reveal" or some shit.
- otterley 1y agoI understood what he meant. He just elided the words "in our code."
- hartator 1y agoI don't think you are being transparent. Like it all sounds like a business decision (limiting 1 device to 1 sub) which is actually that was confirmed both by the actual tech limitation (logging out users from their other devices) and your own support. Blaming the AI, then the user connection, and then some odd race conditions seem unnecessary. You can just say it was a bad business decision, roll it back, and go on with your day. Instead of treating multiple paying users badly.