> I wonder what level of compartmentalisation inside DHS means they didn't see this as having sufficient downsides? The National Vulnerability Database has bee

> I wonder what level of compartmentalisation inside DHS means they didn't see this as having sufficient downsides? The National Vulnerability Database has been unable to keep up with the flow of CVEs for over a year now: - https://anchore.com/blog/national-vulnerability-database-opaque-changes-and-unanswered-questions/ https://anchore.com/blog/national-vulnerability-database-opa... - https://www.cyberreport.io/news/cve-backlog-update-the-nvd-struggles-as-attackers-change-tactics?article=98084 https://www.cyberreport.io/news/cve-backlog-update-the-nvd-s... - https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/cve-backlog-update-nvd-struggles-attackers-change-tactics https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/cve-backlog-update-nvd-st... - and many, many, many others It has been a complete disaster for months. At this point, perhaps the thinking is to radically change approaches?