5 ms·

The missing funding is something like 2 million dollars. Any US company could make this issue go away in an instant.

hubabuba44 1y ago
We will see. I understand that money shouldn't be an issue but trust might be, no?
Sonnigeszeug 1y ago
Its not a money problem, its a understanding problem. Shouldn't the most powerful country has something like this? Being even in the forefront of it? The USA was doing cyberprotection against Russia and cyberattacks across the world. Now suddenly it doesn't need it anymore? Like just did Russia go away (or has russia won and sits now in the white house)?
- drstewart 1y ago
  You're right. I don't understand why the EU wasn't funding it and isn't funding it now. I thought they're united against Russia?
  - lentil_soup 1y ago
    because they already do? https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/ https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/ please, stop spreading your weird anti-europe views
    - drstewart 1y ago
      Great. Then there's no loss here. What's the big deal?
      - sweezyjeezy 1y ago
        Your comments feel a bit incoherent - just extend your reasoning for why you think Europe should want to fund this back to the US again.
        drstewart 1y ago
        Can you extend your reasoning for why you think the US should want to continue to fund this for the EU?
        sweezyjeezy 1y ago
        "for"? You realise this is a homeland security matter for the US as well as the EU?
        drstewart 1y ago
        Great. That's why the EU should fund it for the US. It's a security matter for them!
        lobsterthief 1y ago
        It’s a security matter for the US. It’s a security matter for the EU. Both countries should pay for the security matter, as they were previously. Stop twisting the other poster’s words.
        testbjjl 1y ago
        The GP sounds like one of these people who describe themselves as self made, or libertarian, where history begins where you like it and coalitions are only worthy when you’re the biggest benefactor. Best to ignore and let the leopards find them.
        drstewart 1y ago
        [flagged]
        1y ago

We will see. I understand that money shouldn't be an issue but trust might be, no?

Its not a money problem, its a understanding problem. Shouldn't the most powerful country has something like this? Being even in the forefront of it? The USA was doing cyberprotection against Russia and cyberattacks across the world. Now suddenly it doesn't need it anymore? Like just did Russia go away (or has russia won and sits now in the white house)?

drstewart 1y ago
You're right. I don't understand why the EU wasn't funding it and isn't funding it now. I thought they're united against Russia?
- lentil_soup 1y ago
  because they already do? https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/ https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/ please, stop spreading your weird anti-europe views
  - drstewart 1y ago
    Great. Then there's no loss here. What's the big deal?
    - sweezyjeezy 1y ago
      Your comments feel a bit incoherent - just extend your reasoning for why you think Europe should want to fund this back to the US again.
      - drstewart 1y ago
        Can you extend your reasoning for why you think the US should want to continue to fund this for the EU?
        sweezyjeezy 1y ago
        "for"? You realise this is a homeland security matter for the US as well as the EU?
        drstewart 1y ago
        Great. That's why the EU should fund it for the US. It's a security matter for them!
        lobsterthief 1y ago
        It’s a security matter for the US. It’s a security matter for the EU. Both countries should pay for the security matter, as they were previously. Stop twisting the other poster’s words.
      - testbjjl 1y ago
        The GP sounds like one of these people who describe themselves as self made, or libertarian, where history begins where you like it and coalitions are only worthy when you’re the biggest benefactor. Best to ignore and let the leopards find them.
        drstewart 1y ago
        [flagged]
        1y ago