3 ms·
These explanations are not mutually exclusive.
by gabesullice 1y ago
These explanations are not mutually exclusive.
- girvo 1y agoI think they are a little, but you didn't answer my question?
- gabesullice 1y agoI think my post aged quite well, considering the resolution happened a few hours later, no? Your post was implicitly invoking Occam's razor and so the premise of the question was about deciding which explanation to believe. I rejected that premise because it wasn't necessary to decide between the two explanations—they weren't mutually exclusive. The only proof I had was that I've seen enough of these events resolve themselves very similarly to the way this one was resolved—which is why I was recommending a "wait and see" approach. Call it wisdom or "lived experience".