The amount of blatant pandering OpenAI is doing to California politicians should make everyone suspicious. They are structuring this nonprofit transition as a b

The amount of blatant pandering OpenAI is doing to California politicians should make everyone suspicious. They are structuring this nonprofit transition as a bribe to the California politician-nonprofit complex in exchange for a much more valuable regulatory approval. Their announcement from a few days ago: > built by the leading AI company, put in the hands of nonprofits throughout California, across America and beyond… This commission will also incorporate feedback from leaders and communities in health, science, education, and public services—particularly within OpenAI’s home state of California. These advisors have no connection to AI whatsoever—what they have in common is deep political connections in the state of California. Dolores Huerta is a remarkable woman, but she is a 95 year-old union organizer. The rest of the list is similar. Is there anyone in America who believes OpenAI is making this transition to better achieve its nonprofit’s mission? I would like to meet them.