4 ms·

I think we should be trying to understand what NxGenBdoorExtract is. NxGen is a system for NLRB. Bdoor is pretty evocative of a back door. He took he git offlin

I think we should be trying to understand what NxGenBdoorExtract is. NxGen is a system for NLRB. Bdoor is pretty evocative of a back door. He took he git offline or made it private. I can't find it on archive.org.

snypher 1y ago
Or who has access to DogeSA_2d5c3e0446f9@nlrb.microsoft.com? https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-oversight.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-04-15.gec-to-dol-and-nlrb-ig-re-doge.pdf https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/demo...
jonnycomputer 1y ago
On the other hand, there are two things about that screenshot of the repo which is a little weird. First, the timestamp of that repo is cutoff, but, the items seem to be in reverse chronological order, which would put that repo sometime in 2021-ish, or before. The owner could, of course, just make it public again, or put it back up, and end all the speculation.
anthonygarcia21 1y ago
I'm intrigued by the "Mission 2" notation. That suggests, perhaps, that DOGE has a "Mission 1" (its public, ostensible purpose) and a hidden "Mission 2" known only to Musk and his minions.
e2le 1y ago
archive.today has a snapshot taken on 28 Feb 2025, although it doesn't show any repository with that name. https://archive.ph/fUa5Q https://archive.ph/fUa5Q
- jonnycomputer 1y ago
  This confuses me greatly. Comparing your link, I can find the repos in that screenshot in the archive snapshot, but as you say, the NxGenBdoorExtract repo is not there, and the repo where it would be is a tinder-react-native clone (updated Sep 20 2020)... I'm trying to think through this: 1. if the screenshot is not doctored, then the implied ordering of last updated would have had it last updated before January 20, 2021; which would mean it has nothing to do with what is alleged in the article. 2. But in the archive.ph snapshot from 2/28/25 doesn't have it at all anywhere. 3. Archive.org's 3/21/25 snapshot shows the same thing as archive.ph 4. The article states that after this tweet (https://x.com/SollenbergerRC/status/1895609294810464390 https://x.com/SollenbergerRC/status/1895609294810464390) dated 2/28/25 (the date of the archive.ph 2/28/25 snapshot), Berulis noticed NxGenBdoorExtract in the repo: "After journalist Roger Sollenberger started posting on X about the account, Berulis noticed something Wick was working on: a project, or repository, titled "NxGenBdoorExtract." Wick made it private before Berulis could investigate further, he told NPR. Of course, if it really only was public for a very brief moment then it might not be in the snapshot, and the article isn't clear exactly how long after that tweet that Berulis supposedly discovered this. All I can say is this: I can't figure out for the life of me what all this adds up to.

snypher 1y ago

Or who has access to DogeSA_2d5c3e0446f9@nlrb.microsoft.com? https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-oversight.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-04-15.gec-to-dol-and-nlrb-ig-re-doge.pdf https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/demo...

jonnycomputer 1y ago

On the other hand, there are two things about that screenshot of the repo which is a little weird. First, the timestamp of that repo is cutoff, but, the items seem to be in reverse chronological order, which would put that repo sometime in 2021-ish, or before. The owner could, of course, just make it public again, or put it back up, and end all the speculation.

anthonygarcia21 1y ago

I'm intrigued by the "Mission 2" notation. That suggests, perhaps, that DOGE has a "Mission 1" (its public, ostensible purpose) and a hidden "Mission 2" known only to Musk and his minions.

e2le 1y ago

archive.today has a snapshot taken on 28 Feb 2025, although it doesn't show any repository with that name. https://archive.ph/fUa5Q https://archive.ph/fUa5Q

jonnycomputer 1y ago
This confuses me greatly. Comparing your link, I can find the repos in that screenshot in the archive snapshot, but as you say, the NxGenBdoorExtract repo is not there, and the repo where it would be is a tinder-react-native clone (updated Sep 20 2020)... I'm trying to think through this: 1. if the screenshot is not doctored, then the implied ordering of last updated would have had it last updated before January 20, 2021; which would mean it has nothing to do with what is alleged in the article. 2. But in the archive.ph snapshot from 2/28/25 doesn't have it at all anywhere. 3. Archive.org's 3/21/25 snapshot shows the same thing as archive.ph 4. The article states that after this tweet (https://x.com/SollenbergerRC/status/1895609294810464390 https://x.com/SollenbergerRC/status/1895609294810464390) dated 2/28/25 (the date of the archive.ph 2/28/25 snapshot), Berulis noticed NxGenBdoorExtract in the repo: "After journalist Roger Sollenberger started posting on X about the account, Berulis noticed something Wick was working on: a project, or repository, titled "NxGenBdoorExtract." Wick made it private before Berulis could investigate further, he told NPR. Of course, if it really only was public for a very brief moment then it might not be in the snapshot, and the article isn't clear exactly how long after that tweet that Berulis supposedly discovered this. All I can say is this: I can't figure out for the life of me what all this adds up to.