I don't doubt that sometimes this is the case. However, I don't think it's always the case. However there's a ton of nuance here, and some of the nuance is arou

I don't doubt that sometimes this is the case. However, I don't think it's always the case. However there's a ton of nuance here, and some of the nuance is around what sort of stuff is being written. For creative works outside of commercial art, I don't want it to be AI generated because a ton of the value of those works is directly because they're made by people. The exact same work made by a machine is not as valuable to me. With commercial art and non-creative works, being AI generated is less of an issue, as long as the output was actually reviewed and corrected before publication. Judging by a lot of what I've been seeing, this is often a thing that just doesn't happen. When it doesn't, it devalues the work because of the increased number of errors. Neither of those objections have anything to do with the use of AI being an "easy button" or cheating in some way.