4 ms·
>but using AI to infer nude features is "disturbingly unethical"? If it is against the wishes of the people in the video, yes, yes it is. E: Never thought I'd
by ziddoap 2y ago
>but using AI to infer nude features is "disturbingly unethical"?
If it is against the wishes of the people in the video, yes, yes it is.
E: Never thought I'd see the day I'm downvoted for saying un-blurring porn of people who made porn under the assumption that it would be blurred (and may not have made that same decision without that context) is unethical, on HN of all places, but times are strange I guess.
- anigbrowl 2y agoIn this case it's a legal requirement imposed by the government.
- googlryas 2y agoYes, but their decisions to be porn stars were made within the context of that law. Maybe they wouldn't care about the uncensored version of their video getting out. Maybe they would?
- Der_Einzige 2y agoPiracy is the opposite of unethical, because information wants to be free. IP rights holders had their NAP violated - and society is better off for it. The reason it's "against the wishes" of folks in a JAV video is because of the legal risk it opens them up to from the Japanese government - not because the actors/actresses "don't consent to viewers seeing their uncensored body". Note that I am NOT talking about distribution of non consensual deepfakes. Obviously that's abhorrent.
- ziddoap 2y ago>not because the actors/actresses "don't consent to viewers seeing their uncensored body". How can you possibly know this? They made the career decision while knowing what the law was. They may not have made that decision if the law was different.