You should check Eugene Volokh's space ( https://reason.com/volokh/ https://reason.com/volokh/ ). I would reply with the point made by the Supreme Court of the

You should check Eugene Volokh's space ( https://reason.com/volokh/ https://reason.com/volokh/ ). I would reply with the point made by the Supreme Court of the USA, that the "courts cannot interfere with prerogatives of the executive branch". Which of course leaves big questions about power and apparent abuse of the same, and about what cynics call "collaterals". One detail in clearer terms: if «federal courts [had] no authority to direct the Executive Branch to conduct foreign relations in a particular way», where lies the responsibility of the State towards its victims?