Real question: is there any precedent that simple speech constitutes material support? I don’t particularly think it applies to this case, tbh, given that his

Real question: is there any precedent that simple speech constitutes material support? I don’t particularly think it applies to this case, tbh, given that his actions were focused on Palestine, not on Hamas, but I am curious if there’s any existing legal basis for the claim that someone could be convicted of such material support simply for saying, for example, that the IRA wasn’t unreasonable given the situation at the time.