> Just admitting the mistake was a positive step, which means they do care at least a little bit to not repeat it. Why is this an appropriate conclusion? Step

> Just admitting the mistake was a positive step, which means they do care at least a little bit to not repeat it. Why is this an appropriate conclusion? Stephen Miller went on TV to say that this man is a terrorist and is in the right place, despite sworn statements from the solicitor general that this was a mistake. I see absolutely no reason to believe that the Trump administration sees any reason to prevent further errors. > Imagine for a moment that the judicial branch orders the executive branch to get Iran to release some American prisoners. Hey look, a completely different situation. Here the US sent this person to El Salvador and is paying the Salvadoran government to house people we send there. Not even remotely comparable to the Iranian government capturing somebody.