3 ms·
>Just to be clear, nobody was unclear about that Oh, you were quite unclear. Also wrong in saying you need systemd with podman to orchestrate multiple containe
by coldtea 2y ago
>Just to be clear, nobody was unclear about that
Oh, you were quite unclear. Also wrong in saying you need systemd with podman to orchestrate multiple containers without root.
>It is, just to be clear, red hat's recommended way to orchestrate podman containers despite having this nasty dependency analogous to the one docker has on a root service.
It's not "red hat's recommended way to orchestrate podman containers" in general. It's "red hat's recommended way to orchestrate containers on top of systemd", that its whole point.
Nothing nasty about it either, you'd already be running systemd on your redhat system (and many non red-hat ones).
- pydry 2y ago>Also wrong in saying you need systemd with podman to orchestrate multiple containers without root I explicitly said thay it wasnt needed and that there werent other ways just that it was the recommended way. >It's not "red hat's recommended way to orchestrate podman containers It is.