3 ms·
>Yeah, exactly: the first thing a public health conspiracy has to do is forbid doctors talking about it. Where was that? Also why would a conspiracy forbid peo
by Braxton1980 2y ago
>Yeah, exactly: the first thing a public health conspiracy has to do is forbid doctors talking about it.
Where was that? Also why would a conspiracy forbid people to talk about something when conspiracies often use evidence that something is trying to be hidden to prove their point
- mike_hearn 2y agoThe tribunal states that one of his infractions was publishing a letter he received telling him to stop dissenting. > Also why would a conspiracy forbid people to talk about something It's not a conspiracy if there's no attempt to keep it secret, is it? The fact that some conspiracies are sometimes detected due to mistakes or whistleblowers doesn't mean their attempts at secrecy were useless. Presumably there are conspiracies that are never detected, but even if they are, secrecy and intimidation tactics still have value to the conspirators. Look at this very thread: it's full of people baffled that anyone might not trust their doctor. But if doctors are being forced to toe the line and not reveal that they're being so forced, then you aren't trusting a doctor, you're trusting someone in the licensing authority or public health agencies - very different.
- Braxton1980 2y agoWas the issue the contents of the letter or publishing a private letter